/page/2
electrical-soil:

The Man in the Bowler Hat

electrical-soil:

The Man in the Bowler Hat

(Source: thebestgatsby)

novembernoir:

L’invention de la vie (The Invention of Life).

novembernoir:

L’invention de la vie (The Invention of Life).

(Source: napalmstar)

loneliest-chime:

René Magritte, Attempting The Impossible

loneliest-chime:

René Magritte, Attempting The Impossible

(via william-faulkner-deactivated201)

aardwolf:

Le Seducteur by René Magritte

aardwolf:

Le Seducteur by René Magritte

hegel-now:

Hegel’s Holiday: 1958. Oil on canvas. 61 x 50 cm. Private collection.
[Note by Jay Thompson, Kenyon Review]
Magritte, in a letter, wrote of this painting:

My latest painting began with the question: how to show a  glass of water in a painting in such a way that it would not be  indifferent? Or whimsical, or arbitrary, or weak—but, allow us to use  the word, with genius? (Without false modesty.) I began by drawing many  glasses of water, always with a linear mark on the glass. This line,  after the 100th or 150th drawing, widened out and finally took the form  of an umbrella. The umbrella was then put into the glass, and to  conclude, underneath the glass. Which is the exact solution to the  thought that Hegel (another genius) would have been very sensitive to  this object which has two opposing functions: at the same time not to  admit any water (repelling it) and to admit it (containing it). He would  have been delighted, I think, or amused (as on a vacation) and I call  the painting Hegel’s Holiday.

hegel-now:

Hegel’s Holiday: 1958. Oil on canvas. 61 x 50 cm. Private collection.

[Note by Jay Thompson, Kenyon Review]

Magritte, in a letter, wrote of this painting:

My latest painting began with the question: how to show a glass of water in a painting in such a way that it would not be indifferent? Or whimsical, or arbitrary, or weak—but, allow us to use the word, with genius? (Without false modesty.) I began by drawing many glasses of water, always with a linear mark on the glass. This line, after the 100th or 150th drawing, widened out and finally took the form of an umbrella. The umbrella was then put into the glass, and to conclude, underneath the glass. Which is the exact solution to the thought that Hegel (another genius) would have been very sensitive to this object which has two opposing functions: at the same time not to admit any water (repelling it) and to admit it (containing it). He would have been delighted, I think, or amused (as on a vacation) and I call the painting Hegel’s Holiday.

electrical-soil:

The Man in the Bowler Hat

electrical-soil:

The Man in the Bowler Hat

(Source: thebestgatsby)

(Source: aldoushuxley)

(Source: mylittlefix)

boredstiff:

via shavanta.files.wordpress.com
The Lovers
Magritte

boredstiff:

via shavanta.files.wordpress.com

The Lovers

Magritte

(Source: kelseykels)

novembernoir:

L’invention de la vie (The Invention of Life).

novembernoir:

L’invention de la vie (The Invention of Life).

(Source: napalmstar)

(Source: lentiggini)

loneliest-chime:

René Magritte, Attempting The Impossible

loneliest-chime:

René Magritte, Attempting The Impossible

(via william-faulkner-deactivated201)

aardwolf:

Le Seducteur by René Magritte

aardwolf:

Le Seducteur by René Magritte

hegel-now:

Hegel’s Holiday: 1958. Oil on canvas. 61 x 50 cm. Private collection.
[Note by Jay Thompson, Kenyon Review]
Magritte, in a letter, wrote of this painting:

My latest painting began with the question: how to show a  glass of water in a painting in such a way that it would not be  indifferent? Or whimsical, or arbitrary, or weak—but, allow us to use  the word, with genius? (Without false modesty.) I began by drawing many  glasses of water, always with a linear mark on the glass. This line,  after the 100th or 150th drawing, widened out and finally took the form  of an umbrella. The umbrella was then put into the glass, and to  conclude, underneath the glass. Which is the exact solution to the  thought that Hegel (another genius) would have been very sensitive to  this object which has two opposing functions: at the same time not to  admit any water (repelling it) and to admit it (containing it). He would  have been delighted, I think, or amused (as on a vacation) and I call  the painting Hegel’s Holiday.

hegel-now:

Hegel’s Holiday: 1958. Oil on canvas. 61 x 50 cm. Private collection.

[Note by Jay Thompson, Kenyon Review]

Magritte, in a letter, wrote of this painting:

My latest painting began with the question: how to show a glass of water in a painting in such a way that it would not be indifferent? Or whimsical, or arbitrary, or weak—but, allow us to use the word, with genius? (Without false modesty.) I began by drawing many glasses of water, always with a linear mark on the glass. This line, after the 100th or 150th drawing, widened out and finally took the form of an umbrella. The umbrella was then put into the glass, and to conclude, underneath the glass. Which is the exact solution to the thought that Hegel (another genius) would have been very sensitive to this object which has two opposing functions: at the same time not to admit any water (repelling it) and to admit it (containing it). He would have been delighted, I think, or amused (as on a vacation) and I call the painting Hegel’s Holiday.

(Source: meschiess)

(Source: chilambalam)

About:

This is not a tumblelog.